PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 17, 2025International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2 citationsOpen Access

A Framework for Nonlinearly‐Constrained Gradient‐Enhanced Local Bayesian Optimization With Comparisons to Quasi‐Newton Optimizers

View Full Paper
AMAndré L. MarchildonDZDavid W. Zingg

Key Points

  • Enabled deeper convergence for nonlinearly-constrained unimodal optimization problems using a bayesian optimizer, achieving better results than existing methods.
  • Achieved fewer function evaluations in unimodal problems with 2 to 30 variables compared to popular quasi-newton optimizers, offering significant efficiency gains.
  • Developed methods include an exact augmented lagrangian, enhancing the optimization process in nonlinearly-constrained scenarios.
  • The second method combines constraints with acquisition function minimization, allowing easier parameter tuning for new optimization problems.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Bayesian optimization is a popular and versatile approach that is well suited to solve challenging optimization problems. Their popularity comes from their effective minimization of expensive function evaluations, their capability to leverage gradients, and their efficient use of noisy data. Bayesian optimizers have commonly been applied to global unconstrained problems, with limited development for many other classes of problems. In this article, two alternative methods are developed that enable rapid and deep convergence of nonlinearly‐constrained local optimization problems using a Bayesian optimizer. The first method uses an exact augmented Lagrangian and the second augments the minimization of the acquisition function to contain additional constraints. Both of these methods can be applied to nonlinear equality constraints, unlike most previous methods developed for constrained Bayesian optimizers. The new methods are applied with a gradient‐enhanced Bayesian optimizer and enable deeper convergence for three nonlinearly‐constrained unimodal optimization problems than previously developed methods for constrained Bayesian optimization. In addition, both new methods enable the Bayesian optimizer to reach a desired tolerance with fewer function evaluations than popular quasi‐Newton optimizers from SciPy and MATLAB for unimodal problems with 2 to 30 variables. The Bayesian optimizer had similar results using both methods. It is recommended that users first try using the second method, which adds constraints to the acquisition function minimization, since its parameters are more intuitive to tune for new problems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Marchildon et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4604731b076d99fa5f959https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.70118
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A solution to the ill‐conditioning of gradient‐enhanced covariance matrices for Gaussian processes2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Global Convergence of a Cass of Quasi-Newton Methods on Convex Problems1987 · 324 citations
  3. 3Aerodynamic design via control theory1988 · 1,928 citations
  4. 4Global versus local search in constrained optimization of computer models1998 · 439 citations
  5. 5Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning2012 · 1,437 citations