Prospective analysis shows low IL-6 levels correlate with increased irAE risk in cancer patients, suggesting clinical implications.
Background Among the biomarkers associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer patients, interleukin-6 (IL-6) has emerged as a key predictive factor. However, it remains unclear whether high or low levels of IL-6 predispose patients to irAEs. Our objective was to evaluate the strength of the association between circulating IL-6 levels, measured in cancer patients before and after initiating ICIs, and the risk of irAEs. Methods In this multicenter, prospective pan-cancer cohort study, serum IL-6 levels were quantified immediately before the first (pre-ICI) and second (post-ICI) cycles of ICI therapy. To assess the association between IL-6 and irAEs, Fine and Gray competing risk regression models were fitted, considering irAEs as the main event and death as the competing event. The incremental predictive value of IL-6 levels was evaluated using Harrell’s C-index. Results Overall, 224 patients were followed up for a median of 75.5 days after ICI initiation. The adjusted 1-year cumulative incidence of irAEs was 49.0% (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 41.9-55.6%). Multivariate regression models identified female sex (hazard ratio [HR], 1.81; 95%CI, 1.17-2.81; p=0.008), dual ICI therapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (HR, 1.86; 95%CI, 1.14-3.02; p=0.012) and post-ICI IL-6 levels (HR, 0.97; 95%CI, 0.94-1.00; p=0.049) as independent risk factors for irAEs. Using standardized post-ICI IL-6 levels, the effect was stronger, with an HR of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.55-1.00; p=0.049). Adding post-ICI IL-6 levels to a model containing established irAE risk factors improved the Harrell’s C-index from 0.623 to 0.640. Conclusion In cancer patients treated with ICIs, low rather than high post-ICI IL-6 levels, female sex and dual ICI therapy are independent risk factors for irAEs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Les et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: