PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 17, 2025Review of Education3 citations

Making master's thesis writing a journey of mastery: A systematic review

View Full Paper
MBMadhu Neupane BastolaGHGuangwei Hu

Key Points

  • Proactive student behaviours significantly enhance thesis writing outcomes and supervisory support.
  • A conceptual framework identifies key phases including preparation and student engagement, fostering successful thesis completion.
  • Thematic analysis of 51 studies provides insights that can help optimize the thesis journey across disciplines.
  • Further research is needed to address disparities in student experiences, especially for minority groups in academia.

Abstract

Abstract A master's thesis is a unique blend of independent work and shared responsibility between the supervisor and the student. While the crucial roles of thesis supervisors and institutional environments are widely acknowledged, it is the students' proactive behaviours and actions that hold the key to shaping the level of support they receive and the ultimate outcomes they achieve. This paper presents a systematic review of 51 carefully selected peer‐reviewed studies on writing a master's thesis. Based on a meticulous thematic analysis, the study has developed a conceptual framework encompassing the key phases of preparation, engagement, and outcomes. The findings underscore the importance of students' careful planning before embarking on the thesis journey and their multidimensional engagement as a prerequisite for optimising supervisory support, maximising learning opportunities, and achieving meaningful outcomes. Context and implications Rationale for this study: The master's thesis is widely recognized as a challenging and transformative component of master's degree programs, yet it remains a “neglected essential” in university pedagogy. Why the new findings matter: This systematic review provides a comprehensive framework to promote student agency and engagement, transforming thesis writing into a rich learning journey. Implications for students, supervisors, policy‐makers, and researchers: Students should actively select thesis topics that are well‐aligned with their interests and take ownership of their learning. Supervisors should guide students in topic selection and provide timely, supportive feedback with care and empathy to maintain their engagement. Universities should ensure alignment between students' and supervisors' research interests, reduce supervisory workloads, and provide necessary resources. The systematic review highlights the importance of conducting further research on disciplinary differences, developing practical strategies to help students manage their time effectively, and examining the experiences of minority students, particularly in underrepresented contexts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bastola et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4605131b076d99fa5fc79https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70103
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Writing-to-learn: Strategies to promote engagement, peer-to-peer learning, and active listening in economics courses2022 · 7 citations
  2. 2High-impact educational practices: leveling the playing field or perpetuating inequity?2021 · 28 citations
  3. 3BJEP Monograph Series II: Part 6 Teaching and Learning Writing2009 · 6 citations
  4. 4Mastering the dissertation: lecturers’ representations of the purposes and processes of Master’s level dissertation supervision2006 · 129 citations
  5. 5‘Born Originals, how comes it to pass we die Copies?’ (Edward Young): A case study analysing the Masters’ thesis as a vehicle for student creativity, engagement, and transformative learning.2019 · 4 citations