Quality improvement project evaluates REBOA deployment and training in medical sites across Iraq and Kuwait.
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an endovascular technology indi-cated for temporarily controlling traumatic life-threatening, noncompressible abdominal, truncal, or pelvic hemorrhage. Through percutaneous access or cut-down to the femoral artery, an intra-aortic balloon catheter is fed into the aorta and inflated, occluding distal blood flow and, thus, bleeding. To determine specific barriers to REBOA in deployed environments, we conducted a quality improvement project and survey of ER-REBOA® placement and monitoring capabilities at four medical treatment locations in Iraq and Kuwait during the spring of 2019. The primary objective was to evaluate each in-theater medical site's ability to deploy REBOA, which was defined as having a provider capable of placing REBOA and the minimum equipment necessary. The investigators interviewed providers and through self-reported surveys, determined the personnel capable of placing a REBOA. REBOA equipment and monitoring equipment were identified through direct inspection of sites and interviews with logistical and equipment staff. A total of 113 individuals participated in the evaluation and training. Three of the four sites had the minimum training and equipment requirements to complete the procedure: one REBOA-capable provider, an unexpired ER-REBOA® device, and an unexpired introducer catheter kit. Overall, 6 out of 32 physicians (18.7%) were capable of placing an ER-REBOA. This deployed site survey demonstrates that the minimal requirements and personnel for ER-REBOA placement were met at most studied locations in 2019. However, improvements in pre-deployment training of select medical personnel in REBOA and arterial blood pressure monitoring are recommended to ensure adequate resourcing and redundancy in training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: