Pangenomic analysis reveals distinct plasmid groups in Campylobacter, enhancing risk assessment and molecular typing.
Plasmid-mediated dissemination of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and virulence genes plays a critical role in enhancing the adaptive potential of Campylobacter spp. While Campylobacter plasmids of concern are commonly classified as pTet, pVir, pCC42 or a large plasmid encoding a T6SS (pT6SS), existing classification systems often lack the resolution to capture intra-group diversity. Here we demonstrate a plasmid typing approach with enhanced discriminatory power that categorizes these major plasmid groups into discrete subgroups and strengthens risk-assessment investigations. Pangenomic analysis of 424 Campylobacter plasmid sequences revealed 30 distinct plasmid groups. The four major groups above accounted for 74.3% of the dataset. Within these major groups, 177 plasmid type-specific loci were used to define 16 subgroups. pTet plasmids were subdivided into 5 subgroups, with subgroup 3 enriched in C. coli. pVir plasmids formed 3 subgroups, with only subgroup 3 harboring the tet(O) genes. The 5 pCC42 subgroups displayed Campylobacter species specificity while the 3 pT6SS subgroups encoded distinct AMR profiles. This high-resolution typing approach provides a unified and scalable method to characterize Campylobacter plasmid diversity and identifies genetic markers critical for pathogen surveillance, source attribution and mitigation strategies employed to safeguard human and animal health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harrison et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: