PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 17, 2025Modern Finance3 citationsOpen Access

Could ChatGPT have earned abnormal returns? A retrospective test from the U.S. stock market

View Full Paper
MLMarc F. LoGrasso

Key Points

  • ChatGPT demonstrated an ability to generate monthly average alphas of about 1% across two-year holding periods, indicating potential for abnormal returns.
  • The analysis controlled for various factors such as size and investment approach, ensuring robustness of findings regarding ChatGPT's investments.
  • Individual portfolios saw positive alphas roughly one in four years, highlighting variability in potential returns and the significance of precision in recommendations.
  • The results point to a unique asset allocation strategy employed by ChatGPT, offering insights into its decision-making process in stock recommendations.

Abstract

This paper attempts to assess the ability of OpenAI’s ChatGPT to provide high-quality recommendations for a casual investor looking to beat the market. Going back to 1985 and instructing the GPT-4 model to restrict its knowledge to only what could have been known at the time of stock selection, the GPT-4 model was able to average alphas of approximately 1% per month for two-year holding periods beginning July 1 every year from 1985 to 2021. These abnormal returns persisted after controlling for size, book-to-market, profitability robustness, investment approach, and intermediate- and long-term prior returns. Individual portfolio alphas are only positive and significant about one out of four years but are never negative and significant. This paper also illustrates some of the precision needed to induce the GPT-4 model to provide any recommendations and briefly assesses the asset allocation strategy it appears to pursue.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Marc F. LoGrasso (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4606031b076d99fa60502https://doi.org/10.61351/mf.v3i3.327
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper