Comparative analysis reveals a 53.7% rise in child sexual abuse cases during lockdown, emphasizing urgent need for POCSO Act enforcement.
Background: Child sexual abuse is an issue of global concern, adversely affecting a child's normal maturation and development. The COVID-19 pandemic caused a health and economic crisis, confinement of the masses, and sexual exploitation. Purpose: This was a comparative analysis of the survivors under the POCSO Act (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Amdt.2019) between the lockdown and pre-lockdown periods of the same duration, in terms of number of cases, demographic details, reporting time, and patterns of injuries. Methods: Hospital-based descriptive epidemiological study using secondary data of child sexual abuse survivors from 25/03/2017 to 14/02/2019 and from 25/03/2020 to 14/02/2022. Data distribution was represented in terms of frequencies and percentages. Association and effect size between the various input variables were analyzed using Cliff's delta method and chi-square test, considering a p-value of less than 0.05 to be statistically significant. Results: There was a 53.7% increase in cases in the lockdown period. Consent rate for medical examination dropped from 70.9% to 63.1% during the lockdown. 96.7% and 97.9% were females in the lockdown and pre-lockdown periods, respectively. The highest number of cases was reported in 24-48 hours in the pre-lockdown period as compared to 48-72 hours in the lockdown period. The pre-lockdown period showed rural preponderance. There was a rise in survivors in the age group of zero to six years to 12.3% in the lockdown period. Known faces dominated as perpetrators in both periods. Conclusion: The study revealed an alarming rise in child sexual abuse during COVID-19, calling for strict interventions. It is the duty of society to protect children's basic rights for a better and prosperous future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goswami et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: