To understand if exterior building products are a source of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) to the environment, we measured PFAS in 145 samples of paints, sealers, and textiles, mostly intended for exterior use. We first developed a combined one and two-dimensional diffusion-ordered spectroscopy (1D and 2D-DOSY) fluorine nuclear magnetic resonance (19F NMR) method to characterize and quantify side-chain fluorinated polymers (SCFPs) and nonpolymeric PFAS. Results showed that 36% (22/61), 24% (13/54), and 70% (21/30) of tested paints, sealers, and textiles contained total organic fluorine (TOF) at 0.1–16.1, 0.4–2488, and 0.34–74.0 μmol/g, respectively. Paints mainly contained 6:2 fluorotelomer (FT) and aromatic-CF3 nonpolymeric PFAS, while sealers also contained 6:2 FT SCFPs and perfluorobutane sulfonyl fluoride (PBSF)-based PFAS. Textiles contained 6:2 FT, 8:2 FT, and PBSF-based PFAS indicative of SCFPs. Advanced mass spectrometry methods revealed that paints and sealers with 6:2 FT nonpolymers mainly contained 6:2 fluorotelomer phosphate mono-, di-, and triesters (6:2 mono-, di-, and triPAPs) and 6:2 FT dipyrophosphate, while textiles primarily contained n:2 fluorotelomer alcohols (n:2 FTOH, n = 6, 8) or N-methyl perfluorobutane sulfonamide alcohol (MeFBSE). Based on the PFAS found in these products and the recommendation to reapply the coatings to protect exterior/interior surfaces and the replacement of exterior textiles, these results indicate that building products likely contribute polymeric and nonpolymeric PFAS to the environment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: