Assessment reveals superior performance of GPT-4 in medical abbreviation disambiguation using zero-shot methods.
Abbreviation disambiguation is a critical challenge in processing clinical and biomedical texts, where ambiguous short forms frequently obscure meaning. In this study, we assess the zero-shot performance of large language models (LLMs) on the task of medical ab- breviation disambiguation using the MeDAL dataset, a large-scale resource constructed from PubMed abstracts. Specifically, we evaluate GPT-4 and LLaMA models, prompting them with contextual information to infer the correct long-form expansion of ambiguous abbreviations without any task-specific fine-tuning. Our results demonstrate that GPT-4 substantially outperforms LLaMA across a range of ambiguous terms, indicating a signifi- cant advantage of proprietary models in zero-shot medical language understanding. These findings suggest that LLMs, even without domain-specific training, can serve as effective tools for improving readability and interpretability in biomedical NLP applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nezhad et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: