Assessment reveals ANXA4 prevents cardiomyocyte injury in ischemia-reperfusion models, suggesting novel therapeutic routes.
Myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury (MI/R) remains a major challenge in cardiac transplantation, leading to early graft dysfunction or primary nonfunction, and eventually death. This study explores the role of annexin A4 (ANXA4), a calcium‐dependent phospholipid‐binding protein, in MI/R pathogenesis and investigates its underlying mechanisms. In C57BL/6J mice, ANXA4 expression was moderately increased following MI/R (induced by 45‐min occlusion/24 h reperfusion) (mRNA: sham vs. MI/ R = 1.00 vs. 2.42, p < 0.01; protein: 1.00 vs. 2.39, p < 0.05). To assess its functional role, AAV9 particles (1 × 10 11 viral genomes per mouse) carrying ANXA4 encoding fragments were intravenously injected into mice 4 weeks before the surgery. The forced elevation of ANXA4 reduced IR‐induced myocardial infarction from 41.22% to 18.23%, lowered the ventricular arrhythmias score from 10.83 to 6.00, and creatinine kinase‐myocardial band (CK‐MB) activity from 450 to 268 U/L. ANXA4 overexpression also inhibited cardiomyocyte apoptosis, inflammation, and oxidative stress. In vitro, ANXA4 overexpression mediated by pcDNA3.1 vector protected HL‐1 mouse cardiomyocytes against oxygen–glucose deprivation/reoxygenation (OGD/R)‐induced cell damage. Further high‐throughput transcriptomics illustrated that ANXA4 upregulation significantly suppressed the expression of the receptor for advanced glycosylation end products (RAGE; Log2 Fold change = −3.19, p < 0.05). Mechanistically, ANXA4 repressed the transcription of RAGE by dampening the nuclear translocation of NFκB p50. Collectively, this study demonstrates that ANXA4 is upregulated in the mouse myocardium post MI/R as a compensatory response, and its overexpression alleviates MI/R‐ and OGD/R‐induced cardiomyocyte injury by preventing NFκB p50 from binding to and initiating transcription of RAGE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: