AI model BJ-HepaGS improves grading and staging accuracy in chronic hepatitis B, suggesting enhanced diagnostic consistency.
Abstract Background and aims: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a global challenge, with histological assessment affected by observer variability. We aim to develop and validate BJ-HepaGS, an AI model for consistent evaluation. Methods: BJ-HepaGS was developed using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole-slide images (WSIs) from CHB patients across multiple hospitals. Model performance was validated using area under the curve (AUC) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) metrics. Results: The BJ-HepaGS trained on 673 WSIs (627,703 patches) and validated on independent (300 H&E-WSIs, 331,037 patches) and paired cohorts (n = 100 H&E-WSIs, 52,271 patches). The independent set achieved area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.91–0.98 for grading and 0.85–0.91 for staging, with strong consistency versus expert consensus (ICC = 0.824 and 0.681, respectively). BJ-HepaGS distinguished fibrosis stage F0-1 vs. F2-4 (87.6% accuracy) and cirrhosis (F0-3 vs. F4; 86.0% accuracy), and reliably assessed inflammation improvement (p = 0.885) and fibrosis regression (p = 0.388) in pre- and post-treatment paired samples. With the assistance of AI, the consistency between senior and junior expert interpretations on inflammation and fibrosis were significantly enhanced (both p < 0.001). Conclusions: BJ-HepaGS addresses a key gap in CHB care by providing reproducible, objective histopathological interpretation, supporting standardized diagnosis and improved clinical management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: