PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 18, 2025Economics and Environment0 citationsOpen Access

Identification and segmentation of social and environmental criteria in multi-criteria analysis for selecting infrastructure investment options for road transport

View Full Paper
MBMonika BąkPBPrzemysław BorkowskiEBElżbieta Broniewicz

Key Points

  • The study reveals how reclassifying criteria impacts the validity of evaluations in infrastructure projects.
  • Upgraded standards for social and environmental factors enhance decision-making metrics for road transport investments.
  • A literature review and surveys inform the categorization of social and environmental impacts on infrastructure.
  • The findings support improved frameworks for evaluating investments in road transport infrastructure.

Abstract

Studies show that road investments generate both positive and negative socio-economic and environmental impacts. Social effects include improved accessibility, safety, and reduced inequality, but may also lead to increased accident rates and health concerns. A key challenge in multi-criteria analysis is the accurate identification and classification of social and environmental factors. Methods such as literature reviews, surveys, interviews, and cost-benefit analyses are used to assess these impacts and support decision-making, for example, through social impact assessments. This paper explores the difficulties in categorising various criteria as social or environmental and the implications of these classifications for evaluation processes. The authors propose a revised set of social and environmental standards for multi-criteria assessment of road investment options and examine how reclassifying certain criteria affects their relevance and validity. The study contributes to improving evaluation frameworks for infrastructure planning and supports more informed, socially aware investment decisions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bąk et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d461c231b076d99fa60f91https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2025.93.2.1237
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1International Principles For Social Impact Assessment2003 · 824 citations
  2. 2Application Potential of MCDM/MCDA Methods in Transport—Literature Review and Case Study2025 · 17 citations
  3. 3Social impacts arising from road infrastructure projects in Sub-Saharan Africa: better management of social issues is needed in road construction, upgrading and rehabilitation2024 · 25 citations
  4. 4The Impact of Infrastructure Development on Rural Communities: A Literature Review2018 · 62 citations
  5. 5Cost-benefit analysis of transport projects: Theoretical framework and practical rules2022 · 41 citations