Multi-source framework analyzes whiting events and post-wildfire impacts in Gadouras Reservoir, indicating altered water quality metrics.
The Gadouras Reservoir, Rhodes Island’s primary water source, experiences recurrent whiting events—milky turbidity from calcium carbonate precipitation—that challenge treatment operations, with impacts compounded by a major 2023 wildfire in this fire-prone Mediterranean setting. To elucidate these dynamics, a pragmatic, multi-source monitoring framework integrates archived Sentinel-2 and Landsat imagery with treatment-plant records (2017–mid-2025). Unitless spectral indices (e.g., AreaBGR) for whiting detection and chlorophyll-a proxies are combined with laboratory measurements of turbidity, pH, total organic carbon, manganese, and hydrological metrics, analyzed via spatiotemporal Hovmöller diagrams, Pearson correlations, and interrupted time-series models. Two seasonal whiting regimes are identified: a biogenic summer mode (southern origin; elevated chlorophyll-a; water temperature > 15 °C; pH > 8.5) and a non-biogenic winter mode (northern inflows). Following the wildfire, the system exhibits characteristics that could be related to possible hypolimnetic anoxia, prolonged whiting, a ~50% rise in organic carbon, and a manganese excursion to ~0.4 mg L−1 at the deeper intake. Crucially, the post-fire period shows a decoupling of AreaBGR from turbidity (r ≈ 0.233 versus ≈ 0.859 pre-fire)—a key diagnostic finding that confirms a fundamental shift in the composition and optical properties of suspended particulates. The manganese spike is best explained by the confluence of a wildfire-induced biogeochemical predisposition (anoxia and Mn mobilization) and a consequential operational decision (relocation to a deeper, Mn-rich intake). This framework establishes diagnostic baselines and thresholds for managing fire-impacted reservoirs, supports the use of remote sensing in data-scarce systems, and informs adaptive operations under increasing climate pressures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lioumbas et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: