Experimental analysis reveals critical role of distributed roughness elements in boundary layer transition, suggesting predictive scaling metrics.
Aerodynamic heating-induced ablation generates distributed roughness elements (DRE) on the surfaces of hypersonic vehicles, significantly influencing boundary layer transition and aerodynamic performance. However, location-dependent DRE modulation mechanisms remain unresolved. This study employs surface-mounted PCB® pressure sensor arrays in a Mach 6 wind tunnel to elucidate the critical role of regularly spaced DRE starting locations in modulating hypersonic boundary layer transition over a flat plate. Experimental results reveal that leading-edge DRE starting at X = 0 mm induces significant second-mode instability wave suppression. In comparison, DRE starting at X = 1 mm (with the DRE height-to-local-boundary-layer-thickness ratio k/δref = 2.83) provokes immediate bypass transition to turbulence, while downstream DRE starting at X = 120 mm (k/δref = 0.26) minimally alters natural transition. Addressing the spanwise instability non-uniformity phenomenon in the flat-plate boundary layer, proper orthogonal decomposition analyses were performed and demonstrate that it exhibits fundamentally distinct organization mechanisms across different DRE cases, with mode 3 dominating under leading-edge DRE cases, whereas mode 1 prevails in smooth and downstream DRE cases. Importantly, DRE width variations exert negligible effects on the downstream boundary layer instability across all cases, whereas the k/δref is identified as the critical scaling parameter controlling transition behavior. These findings resolve location-dependent disparities in DRE physics and establish k/δref as a predictive metric for ablation-induced DRE effects, thereby providing critical insights for the design of thermal protection systems on hypersonic vehicles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: