Retrospective cohort study identifies tumor-related factors affecting treatment response in oropharyngeal carcinoma, suggesting improved patient stratification.
Objective Oropharyngeal carcinoma represents a tumor with an increased concern in human health and treatment strategy. This study aims to identify any tumor or patient‐related characteristics capable of predicting response to non‐surgical curative treatment in a cohort of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma and define oncological outcomes of overall survival and progression‐free survival. Methods A monocentric retrospective cohort study was performed, including 223 patients with non‐metastatic oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with curative intent with a non‐surgical strategy. Patients were treated at the University Hospital of Modena (Italy) after a multidisciplinary evaluation between January 2010 and December 2021. The treatment response was assessed by using the RECIST 1.1 Criteria on imaging performed 3 months after treatment. Results Tonsil subsite and stage I were independently associated with a complete treatment response (OR = 0.53, p = 0.05, and OR = 0.32, p = 0.01, respectively). The association between smoking and p16− status resulted in a higher probability of a not‐complete response (OR = 1.72, p = 0.05). Similar results were found for soft palate subsite, cT4, N2 in the p16+ group, and stage IVb in the p16− group. Conversely, cT1 was associated with a higher probability of complete response. Age and the extension to nearby structures did not influence the response. Conclusions This retrospective study shows a possible stratification of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma based on factors that influence treatment response rate. The identification of a phenotype of a non‐responding tumor could better define therapeutic and follow‐up programs. Level of Evidence 4.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mattioli et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: