Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study indicates mortality trends in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction after valve replacement, highlighting clinical predictors.
Abstract Background: Patients with severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (ejection fraction [EF] ≤35%) undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) are considered high-risk patients. This study evaluated contemporary outcomes in such patients undergoing SAVR for severe aortic stenosis (AS) or aortic regurgitation (AR) and identified clinical and echocardiographic predictors of mortality. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 84 patients (>18 years) with EF ≤35% who underwent SAVR between 2015 and 2024. The cohort comprised 53 patients with AS and 31 with AR. Clinical, echocardiographic, and myocardial strain data were collected before and 6 months after SAVR. Mortality data were obtained from national registries, with follow-up through March 2025. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify mortality predictors. Results: Median EF was 28% in AS and 31.1% in AR. Patients with AR were significantly younger than those with AS (44 vs. 63 years, p <0.001). In-hospital mortality for AS was 9.4%, increasing to 13.2% at 1 year and 43.4% at 55 months. Patients with AR showed no in-hospital deaths and 32.3% mortality at 55 months. Eight-year survival was 38.7% in patients with AS and 43.1% in patients with AR. In AS, hypertension (hazard ratio [HR] = 6.46, p = 0.012) and preoperative velocity time integral (HR = 0.97, p = 0.006) predicted mortality. In AR, only length of hospital stay (HR = 1.13, p = 0.017) was predictive. Conclusion: SAVR in severe LV dysfunction offers favorable medium-term survival, with clinical factors guiding prognosis. Trial Registration: Institut Jantung Negara Ethics Committee (IJNREC/779/2025).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aslannif et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: