This study compares gastroesophageal reflux characteristics and outcomes in human milk and formula-fed preterm infants, revealing significant differences in reflux metrics.
Objective To compare the characteristics of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and clinical outcomes among human milk-fed vs. formula-fed infants evaluated for GER disease (GERD). Methods Preterm-born infants ( N = 316, 30.1 ± 3.4 weeks gestation) referred for 24-h pH-impedance testing at 39.8 ± 1.4 weeks postmenstrual age. GER characteristics, short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the human milk- vs. formula-fed infants. Results Human milk-fed infants (vs. formula-fed) had a greater acid reflux index (ARI), and an increased number of acid reflux events, prolonged acid events, and greater proximal acid exposure ( P < 0.05). There were no differences ( P > 0.05) in symptoms, acid clearance, bolus clearance, distal baseline impedance, and discharge outcomes. Bayley composite scores at 2 years were distinct ( P < 0.05) for the distribution (%) of receptive and fine motor skills, favoring human milk-fed infants. Conclusions Despite the pathophysiology caused by acid-GER events, human milk properties may provide better adaptation and modulation of neurosensory and neuromotor responses upon esophageal provocation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osborn et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: