Assessing the Correlation of At-Home Audio Testing and In-office Uroflowmetry: Moving Towards a New Gold-Standard

Objectives: The incidence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) increases with age. Uroflowmetry, a diagnostic tool for LUTS, requires that patients travel to their urologist's office. As audio-based uroflowmetry is being developed in the field, research is needed to evaluate whether it is equivalent to the gold standard, in-clinic uroflowmetry. Methods: Men over age 18 with a chief complaint of LUTS conducted a standard in-office uroflowmetry and used the Emano Flow phone application for one week to conduct audio-based uroflowmetry. Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) was utilized to assess the relationship between conventional and the mean of audio-based Qmax after adjusting for the effect of void volume by performing residualization. Results: Thirty-two participants were recruited. On average, a patient's home volume was 2.18x (SD 1.67) higher than their clinic volume. Prior to adjusting for void volume, conventional and the mean of multiple at-home maximum flow rates were not correlated (PCC=0.21, p=0.31). After adjusting for void volume, conventional and mean of multiple at-home Qmax were significantly correlated (PCC=0.41, p = 0.04). Conclusion: Prior to adjusting for void volume, conventional and at-home maximum flow rates were not correlated. This can be explained, in part, by patients having one uncharacteristically low in-clinic on-demand void. Once we adjusted for void volume, office and at-home Qmax were correlated. As office Qmax may not accurately capture a patient's natural voiding patterns, our findings underscore the potential value of at-home testing. Further work is needed to improve the tools that we use for diagnosing and evaluating LUTS.