Retrospective analysis reveals significant posterior odontoid tilt in scoliosis patients, indicating further imaging may be necessary.
Objective: The odontoid process is an important anatomical structure providing a balance of mobility and stability at the craniocervical junction, with structural and biomechanical associations, and morphology that can be quantified with various measurements. The odontoid tilt angle is a measurement that must be accurately performed and can guide further investigations. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of 100 cervical spinal magnetic resonance imaging was performed on patients investigated for neck pain, with a known history of scoliosis, and compared with 50 control patients. Posterior odontoid tilt and Cobb angles were measured by a musculoskeletal radiology fellow and a fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologist with more than 10 years of experience, with descriptive statistics then performed on the measurements. Results: One hundred and thirty-two patients met the inclusion criteria, across both the scoliosis and control groups. 9 (18%) patients from the control group demonstrated posterior odontoid tilt, compared with 35 (43%) of patients in the scoliosis group. A range of scoliosis curve morphologies were demonstrated: 62 thoracolumbar, 10 thoracic, 9 lumbar, and 1 cervicothoracic, with average Cobb angles of 24.3°, 26.9°, 23.4, and 54°, respectively. There was good interobserver agreement for both measurements and a statistically significant difference in the posterior odontoid tilt measurements between groups (99% confidence interval, P = 0.0064). Conclusion: We recommend opportunistically assessing for the posterior odontoid tilt (Leaning odontoid tower of BRUMES (Botchu; Raja Rasul; Uldin; Morgan;Elias; Sonal, Shashank, Shirodkar). In cases with a posterior tilt angle >5°, we recommend whole spine imaging to assess for scoliosis in the thoracolumbar spine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raja et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: