Computational analysis reveals steric demands dictate isomer preferences in MX4L2 complexes, suggesting new pathways for design.
Computational energy comparisons of cis– and trans d0 MX4L2 complexes (M = Zr/Hf; X = F, Cl, I, L = Lewis base ligand lacking π-acceptor capability) show that cis geometries are preferred when the steric demands of the X and L ligands are small, while trans geometries are preferred for larger ligands. This holds because of the removal of the largest factor affecting the thermodynamic trans influence: metal–ligand π backbonding. Although a mathematical equation relating ligand size and isomer preference could not be found, thresholds for preference changes were determined for π-neutral NR3/PR3 and potential π-donor OR2/SR2 ligands using the SUMΔ parameter obtained from cis structures. The model predicts computationally determined preferences well and agrees with experimental findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas M. Gilbert (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: