The interplay between politics and sport remains widespread and especially vivid in the last few years. Political neutrality, a term that started to take the pace in sports, academic, and political forums, formally represents a key principle in accordance with the Olympic Charter. This paper critically examines the concept of political neutrality within the global sports movement, focusing on its historical evolution and contemporary challenges. Using a case study approach, particularly focusing on two conflicts Ukraine (2022) and Palestine (2023) aim to shed light on the selective application of the concept by International Sports Organizations. Grounded in institutional theory, the paper presents how isomorphic pressures shape International Sports Organizations' decisions resulting in the politicization of neutrality and double standards in sports governance. The paper concludes with recommendations for structural reforms to ensure the application of the concept of political neutrality and uphold the autonomy of the global sports movement.
Marko Begović (2025) studied this question.