This benchmark evaluates affinity prediction in protein-ligand interactions, highlighting Boltz-2's limitations.
The incredible advances in deep learning architectures have not only led to successful protein structure prediction methods, but also to many interesting new methods related to protein-ligand docking and co-folding. The most recent biomolecular foundation model, Boltz-2, even claimed to approach the performance of free-energy perturbation (FEP) in estimating small molecule–protein binding affinity. However, there is still an ongoing debate about the capabilities of such models regarding generalisation or memorisation. A comprehensive assessment remains difficult due to the lack of demanding and relevant benchmark data sets. Here, we present a new approach to benchmark affinity prediction based on the inter-protein scoring noise problem of classical scoring functions. This well-known phenomenon describes the problem that classical scoring functions are capable of enriching active molecules for a protein target but are unable to identify the correct protein target for a given active molecule. This is due to scoring variation between different binding pockets, which limits the ranking capabilities for target identification. In contrast, a successful and reliable binding affinity prediction method should be able to identify the correct protein target and differentiate between binders and non-binders. We therefore developed a new benchmark set for target identification based on the LIT-PCBA and tested whether Boltz-2 can correctly identify the target of active molecules. Our study highlights that, while the affinity module of Boltz-2 seems promising, it is still not able to identify the correct protein target by correctly predicting a higher binding affinity in comparison to the decoy targets. This indicates that a generalisation of protein-ligand interactions is still not achieved, which is in line with other benchmarks that indicate a memorizing effect. Such a benchmark can be seen as the next major hurdle to successful deep-learning-based affinity prediction using protein-ligand complexes. Any model or method truly capable of accurate binding affinity prediction should perform well on target-prediction benchmark tasks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grieswelle et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: