Data collection compares lidar performance with snow clutter and visibility issues in arctic weather.
We present here the results of a data collection campaign involving a 1550nm and 900nm lidar operating in severe winter weather conditions. Data for both lidars was collected simultaneously during arctic-like conditions where fine snow or ice particles are often suspended in the air severely reducing visibility. In this work we qualitatively and quantitatively compare the performance of these lidars. Performance is compared with respect to clutter noise from scattering, object detection in the presence of snow. We find the 1550 nm lidar is more likely to detect snow, resulting in increased clutter noise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mattson et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: