Bibliometric analysis identifies research trends and hotspots in pelvic fractures, suggesting new frontiers.
Background: Pelvic fractures have consistently been a focal point in orthopedic research. This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the literature on pelvic fractures published between 1983 and 2023, revealing research trends, hotspots, and frontiers in this field. Objective: This study aimed to provide a comprehensive bibliometric and knowledge graphbased analysis of pelvic fracture literature published between 1983 and 2023, identifying research trends, hotspots, and emerging frontiers in this field. Methods: We searched the Web of Science database using a predefined strategy restricted to review articles and original research articles, excluding studies outside orthopedics and surgery. Medical entities and relationships were extracted to construct a comprehensive knowledge graph. Entity recognition, relationship extraction, and network topology analyses were performed to map research evolution and collaboration networks. Results: A total of 5248 articles were included for analysis. The results show a steady increase in the annual publication of pelvic fracture research, particularly after 2005. The United States, Germany, and China are the top three coun-tries in terms of the number of publications, with the University of Wash-ington, University of California, and University of San Francisco ranking the top three regions. Pohlmann T published the most significant number of ar-ticles, and Vaidya R was the strongest citation bursts author. Research on pelvic fractures has made significant progress over the past forty years, espe-cially in treatment techniques and methods. Bibliometric analysis reveals re-search hotspots in this field, such as hemostasis control, fracture fixation techniques, and osteoporotic fractures. Conclusions: This study employs bibliometrics to quantify and delineate the contemporary research landscape and trends in pelvic fracture research, aspiring to provide scholars with a compass for navigating the realm of pelvic fracture-related research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: