Machine learning predicts PA assessment timeframes in New South Wales, suggesting improved insights for planning applications.
Despite housing supply shortages in financialised housing markets and acknowledgement of planning application (PA) assessment times as a supply side constraint, reliable and accessible information on PA assessment timeframes is limited. It is in this context that we built a model to predict and explain PA assessment timeframes in New South Wales, Australia. We constructed a dataset of 17,000 PAs (submitted over 3 years) comprising PA attributes, environmental and zoning restrictions, and features derived from PA descriptions using natural language processing techniques. Quantile regression was applied using machine learning modelling to predict probabilistic intervals for assessment timeframes. We then employed an advanced model explanation tool to analyse feature contributions on an overall and individual PA basis. The best performing model, an extreme gradient boosted machine (XGB), achieved an R2 of 0.431, predicting 60.9% of assessment times within one month of actual values. While performance is moderate, the model significantly improves upon previous studies and the current best practice in NSW, which is simply average estimates, by council area, for PA assessment timeframes. The paper concludes by outlining suggestions for further improving model performance and on the benefits of a predictive tool for planners.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thackway et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: