PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 19, 2025Emotion4 citations

Transactional dynamics between parental responsiveness and child emotion dysregulation: A longitudinal study from infancy to early school age.

View Full Paper
JKJuyoung KimGKGrazyna Kochanska

Key Points

  • Parent-to-child effects were significant during toddlerhood, with higher parental responsiveness leading to better emotion regulation.
  • Child-to-parent effects occurred only in father-child dyads, where children's emotion regulation influenced paternal responsiveness.
  • Fathers appear more adaptable in responding to children's emotional needs compared to mothers, highlighting a fluidity in caregiving dynamics.
  • Bidirectional relationships in emotion regulation did not present significant associations during infancy or early school age.

Abstract

Bidirectional influences between parenting and children's emotion regulation are well established, but developmental shifts in these dynamics and differences between mother- and father-child relationships are far from understood. We examined such bidirectional dynamics from infancy to early school age in 102 U.S. Midwestern community families (51 girls), using an autoregressive latent trajectory model that enabled us to distinguish within-dyad co-regulatory processes from traitlike stability across dyads. Parental responsiveness and child emotion (dys)regulation were coded from observed parent-child interactions at seven time points from 7 months to 6.5 years. Results demonstrated significant parent-to-child effects during toddlerhood in both mother- and father-child dyads, with higher parental responsiveness predicting better subsequent emotion regulation in children. However, child-to-parent effects were observed only in father-child dyads, such that children with poorer emotion regulation elicited more, and those with better emotion regulation elicited less paternal responsiveness at the later time point. These findings suggest fathers may adjust caregiving more flexibly, balancing recognition of children's emotional needs and of their growing autonomy, whereas maternal responsiveness may be less influenced by fluctuations in child emotion (dys)regulation. No significant bidirectional associations were observed in infancy or early school age. Findings suggest that bidirectional dynamics are developmentally fluid in early parent-child relationships and that, surprisingly, fathers may be more adept at calibrating their responsiveness based on children's regulatory needs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kim et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d464ff31b076d99fa64a38https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001588
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effortful control in early childhood: Continuity and change, antecedents, and implications for social development.2000 · 1,976 citations
  2. 2EMOTION REGULATION: A THEME IN SEARCH OF DEFINITION1994 · 2,968 citations
  3. 3Mothers’ aversion sensitivity and reciprocal negativity in mother–child interactions: Implications for coercion theory.2022 · 5 citations
  4. 4Clarifying Parent–Child Reciprocities During Early Childhood: The Early Childhood Coercion Model2004 · 325 citations
  5. 5Dysregulated Fear in Toddlerhood Predicts Kindergarten Social Withdrawal through Protective Parenting2014 · 37 citations