Analysis reveals that higher mFI-5 scores predict increased reoperation and mortality in digit replantation patients, suggesting improved risk assessment.
Background: Digit replantation has a significant risk of postoperative complications including an estimated reoperation rate around 14%. This study evaluates the modified frailty index 5 (mFI-5) in predicting postoperative complications including reoperation for digit replantation. Methods: The American College of Surgeons’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2007-2019) was queried to identify patients who underwent upper extremity blood vessel repair distal to the wrist. Demographics, patient characteristics, mFI-5 scores, and all complications, including reoperation and readmission, were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses to identify associations between mFI-5 and complications. Results: We identified 1336 patients who underwent digit replantation. Of those, 99 patients (7.4%) had mFI-5 ≥ 3. Frail patients were defined as having mFI-5 ≥ 3 based on prior literature. Higher mFI-5 scores correlated with increased rates of all-cause complications (mFI-5 ≥ 3: 51.5% vs mFI-5 = 0: 9.2%, P < .001), readmission (mFI-5 ≥ 3: 15.8% vs mFI-5 = 0: 2.2%, P < .001), and reoperation (mFI-5 ≥ 3: 8.8% vs mFI-5 = 0: 3.1%, P < .001). Multivariate analysis indicated that an mFI-5 score ≥ 3 significantly increased the rates of any complication (odds ratio [OR] = 9.1, 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.9-21.2, P < .001), mortality (OR = 5.4, 95% CI, 1.1-27.0, P = .04), surgical complications (OR = 7.5, 95% CI, 2.5-22.9, P < .001), and medical complications (OR = 13.4, 95% CI, 3.9-46.7, P < .001). These patients also had lower odds of home discharge (OR = 0.35, 95% CI, 0.22-0.56, P < .001) and higher odds of unplanned readmission (OR = 1.4, 95% CI, 1.3-1.5, P < .001) compared with those with mFI-5 = 0. Conclusions: The mFI-5 is an effective tool for predicting adverse outcomes in digit replantation. It is simple to calculate preoperatively and aids in risk stratification, perioperative counseling, operative planning, and postoperative outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stead et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: