PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 19, 2025Resources0 citationsOpen Access

Multi-Factorial Risk Mapping for the Safety and Resilience of Critical Infrastructure in Urban Areas

View Full Paper
IPIzabela PiegdońBTBarbara Tchórzewska-CieślakKBKrzysztof Boryczko

Key Points

  • The study highlights the importance of mapping risk in water distribution systems to enhance resilience and safety.
  • Analysis shows that cast iron and steel pipes over 400 mm in diameter have the highest risk of failure, with a risk value of 80.
  • A comprehensive approach combines statistical data and GIS tools for improved decision-making and urgency in response scenarios.
  • The methodology supports both technical and social dimensions of risk management, emphasizing the need for real-time data integration.

Abstract

The increasing complexity of Water Distribution Systems (WDSs), driven by urbanization, climate change, and aging infrastructure, necessitates robust methods for risk assessment and visualization. This study presents a practical methodology for mapping the risk of water supply disruption or reduction using five parameters: Probability (P), Consequences (C), Water Pipe category (WP), Inhabitants exposed (I), and response Efficiency (E). The approach enables comprehensive analysis of the risk associated with specific pipeline segments within an Analyzed Supply Area (ASA). The method integrates statistical and operational data, allowing utilities to evaluate vulnerability, identify Critical Infrastructure (CI), and prioritize maintenance. The investigation conducted during the study revealed that cast iron and steel pipes with large diameters (e.g., 400 mm) show the highest failure probability and impact. Despite a calculated risk value (rLW = 80), effective response measures—including specialized repair teams and equipment—kept the risk acceptable. The results demonstrate that historical failure and response data enhance risk identification and management. The generated risk maps facilitate spatial visualization of high-risk areas, supporting decision-making processes, renovation planning, and emergency preparedness. Integration with GIS tools, including GeoMedia and Google Earth programmes, enables dynamic map creation and simulation of response scenarios. The methodology is scalable and adaptable to any WDS, and potentially to other municipal systems such as wastewater and heating networks. By accounting for both technical and social dimensions of risk, the method supports improved water safety planning and infrastructure resilience. Future development should include real-time data integration and climate-related risk scenarios to increase predictive accuracy and system adaptability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Piegdoń et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d466be31b076d99fa659dbhttps://doi.org/10.3390/resources14090146
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper