PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 19, 2025Brain Sciences15 citationsOpen Access

Exploring Imagined Movement for Brain–Computer Interface Control: An fNIRS and EEG Review

View Full Paper
RFRobert FinnisAMAdeel MehmoodHHHenning Holle

Key Points

  • Imagined movement prediction using BCIs shows potential, but is less reliable than actual motor execution.
  • Hybrid systems combining EEG and fNIRS enhance classification accuracy in motor imagery tasks.
  • Advancements in machine learning techniques improve online decoding capabilities for imagined movements.
  • This review categorizes approaches based on neuroimaging modalities and highlights the need for interdisciplinary collaboration.

Abstract

Brain–Computer Interfaces (BCIs) offer a non-invasive pathway for restoring motor function, particularly for individuals with limb loss. This review explored the effectiveness of Electroencephalography (EEG) and function Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) in decoding Motor Imagery (MI) movements for both offline and online BCI systems. EEG has been the dominant non-invasive neuroimaging modality due to its high temporal resolution and accessibility; however, it is limited by high susceptibility to electrical noise and motion artifacts, particularly in real-world settings. fNIRS offers improved robustness to electrical and motion noise, making it increasingly viable in prosthetic control tasks; however, it has an inherent physiological delay. The review categorizes experimental approaches based on modality, paradigm, and study type, highlighting the methods used for signal acquisition, feature extraction, and classification. Results show that while offline studies achieve higher classification accuracy due to fewer time constraints and richer data processing, recent advancements in machine learning—particularly deep learning—have improved the feasibility of online MI decoding. Hybrid EEG–fNIRS systems further enhance performance by combining the temporal precision of EEG with the spatial specificity of fNIRS. Overall, the review finds that predicting online imagined movement is feasible, though still less reliable than motor execution, and continued improvements in neuroimaging integration and classification methods are essential for real-world BCI applications. Broader dissemination of recent advancements in MI-based BCI research is expected to stimulate further interdisciplinary collaboration among roboticists, neuroscientists, and clinicians, accelerating progress toward practical and transformative neuroprosthetic technologies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Finnis et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d466be31b076d99fa65a0fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15091013
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper