PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 19, 2025Journal of Clinical Medicine3 citationsOpen Access

Management of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Pathophysiology, Risk Stratification, and Ablation Strategies

View Full Paper
GSGiuseppe SgaritoFCFrancesco CampoSSSergio Sciacca

Key Points

  • Up to 50% of patients with LVADs experience ventricular arrhythmias in the first year after implantation, posing significant risks.
  • The link between ventricular arrhythmias and increased morbidity includes higher instances of ICD shocks and right ventricular failure.
  • Catheter ablation shows promise as a treatment option when other therapies fail, though procedural challenges exist due to altered anatomy.
  • A multidisciplinary approach is vital for optimizing outcomes in managing ventricular arrhythmias in LVAD recipients.

Abstract

Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are common and clinically important complications in patients supported by left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), occurring in up to 50% of cases within the first year after implantation. Despite the hemodynamic support provided by LVADs, VAs are linked to increased morbidity and mortality, primarily through recurrent implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks and right ventricular failure. The underlying mechanisms of VAs in this population are multifactorial, involving structural myocardial remodeling, device-related factors, and pre-existing arrhythmic substrates. Catheter ablation has become a valuable treatment option when antiarrhythmic drug therapy and device reprogramming are inadequate, though procedural timing (pre-, intra-, or post-implantation) and approaches remain under discussion. Epicardial access during LVAD surgery may provide advantages for selected patients, while ablation after implantation poses technical challenges due to altered anatomy and electromagnetic interference. This review offers a comprehensive overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk stratification, and management of VAs in LVAD recipients, emphasizing technical considerations, procedural safety, and clinical outcomes of catheter ablation. A multidisciplinary approach remains essential in guiding personalized treatment and optimizing outcomes for this complex population. Undergoing studies will provide more insight into optimal management of arrhythmias, particularly regarding the optimal timing of catheter ablation. The impact of new technologies such as non-invasive mapping alongside pre-procedural imaging needs also to be further evaluated.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sgarito et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d466be31b076d99fa65a20https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186604
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Electromagnetic Interference of Automatic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator and HeartWare Left Ventricular Assist Device2013 · 24 citations
  2. 2Characterization of ventricular tachycardia ablation in end-stage heart failure patients with left ventricular assist device (CHANNELED registry)2025 · 8 citations
  3. 3Ventricular arrhythmias following continuous‐flow left ventricular assist device implantation: A systematic review2020 · 30 citations
  4. 4Effect of Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation in Patients With Heart Mate II Left Ventricular Assist Devices: An Evaluation of Ablation Therapy2016 · 30 citations
  5. 5Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Patients Supported by Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices2014 · 47 citations