Background Bloodborne viruses, including Hepatitis B (HBV), are a known occupational hazard for healthcare workers (HCWs), particularly those involved in exposure-prone procedures. Whilst standard vaccines can provide immunity, 5–10% of people remain non-responders (anti-HBs titre <10IU/L) despite repeated vaccinations. Fendrix® (HBV recombinant DNA vaccine) has been shown to be highly effective in renal patients and those with human immunodeficiency virus, implying it may also have benefits for healthy non-responders. Aims Our analysis set out to identify and compare response rates to re-vaccination (with Fendrix® or HBvaxPro40®) in HCWs with non-response to standard vaccination procedures. Methods Between 1 March 2010 and 30 April 2024, either Fendrix® or HBvaxPro40® was offered to HCWs with inadequate response to two courses of Engerix B® standard vaccination. Antibody tests were performed 6 weeks post-final vaccine dose. Serological results from this period were retrospectively statistically analysed to compare differential vaccine responses. Results Eighty-five HCWs were identified as non-responders and offered further vaccination (42 received Fendrix® and 43 received HBvaxPro40®). Fendrix® resulted in a seroconversion rate of 95% (40/42) compared to 72% (31/43) with HBvaxPro40®; a significantly higher number responded more strongly to Fendrix® (74% versus 23%). Conclusions Our results demonstrate the rationale for offering additional vaccination with Fendrix® to HCWs when standard vaccination and repeated administration has not elicited an adequate immune response. Multi-centre evaluation of this vaccination strategy for non-responder HCWs should be considered to generate evidence for the most acceptable and efficacious approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kroening et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: