PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 19, 2025International Journal of Refugee Law3 citationsOpen Access

Internally Displaced Persons and Exclusion Clauses

View Full Paper
BGBríd Ní­ Ghráinne

Key Points

  • This article highlights the lack of clarity in defining exclusion criteria for internally displaced persons.
  • Significantly less legal literature exists on IDPs compared to refugees, underscoring a critical knowledge gap.
  • An analysis of exclusion clauses in various areas of law may inform the legal status of IDPs.
  • Clarifying IDP definitions is essential for proper protections under international legal standards.

Abstract

Abstract According to the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement, Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) are persons who have been forced or obliged to flee or leave their homes or places of habitual residence for reasons such as violence, human rights violations, and disasters, and who have not crossed an internationally-recognized state border. Internal Displacement has been on the international agenda for decades, and yet it has received significantly less attention in legal literature than other categories of vulnerable individuals. This is particularly so in respect of the IDP description. There are countless works that analyse in rigorous detail the definitions of other categories of forced migrants, such as refugees, or trafficked persons, for example, but we have significantly less knowledge on what it means, in legal terms, to be an IDP. We have even less knowledge on who is excluded from the IDP description. Is an individual who has committed murder, aggression, and/or terrorism offences excluded from being an IDP? The key framework for the protection of IDPs—the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement—does not address this issue and neither does scholarship. This can be contrasted to refugee law, where there are explicit clauses in the 1951 Refugee Convention as well as many analyses in scholarship ascertaining who is excluded from refugee status. This article therefore aims to answer the following question: Should there be exclusionary criteria regarding the IDP description? Answering this question is important because it will give us greatly-needed clarification on who counts—and who does not count—as an IDP. The article will proceed as follows: the introductory section sets out the article’s aims, structure, and contribution to literature. Part 2 will explain the article’s significance and Part 3 will briefly explain who an IDP is to provide a better understanding of whether anyone should be excluded from the IDP concept. Part 4 will examine whether exclusion clauses make sense in the IDP context, drawing on insights from the three branches of law which have inspired and/or formed the basis of the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement: international refugee law, international human rights law, and international humanitarian law. Part 5 will conclude.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bríd Ní­ Ghráinne (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d469ba31b076d99fa65f86https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeaf016
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Internally Displaced Persons and the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement: Historical Antecedents and Contemporary Relevance2022
  2. 2Internally Displaced Persons and the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement: From Theory to Practice2024
  3. 3Internally Displaced Persons’ Participation in Durable Solutions Processes in International Human Rights Law2026
  4. 4Legal Frameworks and Prevailing Practices in Protecting Conflict-Induced Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) in Ethiopia: Evidence from the Eastern Zone of Tigray2026
  5. 5Emergency Governance and the Unequal Protection of Internally Displaced People: Political Alignment, State Responses, and Human Security in Conflict-Affected States2026