This perspective analyzes biological contaminants and concentrate management strategies in potable reuse systems globally, highlighting research gaps.
Potable reuse, the use of treated wastewater for drinking, is becoming more common globally. Reverse osmosis is a common treatment technology employed in potable reuse treatment trains because it is a physical barrier to most biological and chemical contaminants, but it produces a concentrate stream that must be managed. The concentrate includes chemical contaminants of concern, which are an emerging topic of research, but we were not able to identify studies characterizing biological contaminants in reverse osmosis concentrate from municipal wastewater. In this perspective, we i) determine how common the use of reverse osmosis is in potable reuse globally; ii) determine current management practices for concentrate globally; iii) identify biological contaminants in reverse osmosis concentrate; and iv) summarize factors that need further research to assess the fate of biological contaminants from wastewater in reverse osmosis concentrate. Factors identified that needed further research included the effects of reverse osmosis concentrate composition (eg, salinity and heavy metal content) and the effectiveness of concentrate treatment technologies on biological contaminants. In addition, we identified that ocean (11/22 coastal facilities) and other surface water bodies (4/7 inland facilities) were the most common reverse osmosis concentrate management strategies for coastal and inland potable reuse facilities, respectively. Ultimately, concentrate from these facilities was discharged to surface water bodies, either directly or through sewer discharge, which highlights the potential for human exposure that depends on the uses of the receiving surface water bodies. To our knowledge, this is the first summary of current global potable reuse treatment trains concentrate management. This work will inform future research and regulatory decisions about reverse osmosis concentrate treatment and management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kennedy et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: