Descriptive cross-sectional study shows a moderate correlation between self-efficacy and treatment adherence in hypertension patients, suggesting areas for improvement.
Aim: Hypertension is a chronic disease and a serious health problem that can lead to various complications. Hypertension follow-up and treatment control are important. This study was conducted to determine the relationship between the self-efficacy and treatment compliance levels of hypertension patients. Material and Methods: The study is descriptive-cross-sectional. Three hundred and four people who met the inclusion criteria were reached at the designated family health center. The data collection tool consists of 4 sections (Descriptive Characteristics, Information on Hypertension, Hypertension Self-Efficacy Scale, Hill-Bone Hypertension Treatment Adherence Scale). Data were collected by face-to-face interview method. Percentage, mean, parametric tests were used in the analysis of the data. Statistical significance level was determined as p ≤0.05. Results: The average age of the participants was 62.80±10.84 and it was determined that the wound had HT for 1–5 years. The rate of those who regularly go for Hypertension check-ups was found to be 71.7%. The participants’ total mean score on the Hypertension Self-Efficacy Scale was 54.33±12.41, and the total mean score on the Hill-Bone Treatment Adherence Scale was 27.43±6.71. A negative moderate correlation was found between the Hypertension Self-Efficacy Scale and the Hill-Bone Treatment Adherence Scale. (r=-0.479; p<0.01). Conclusion and recommendations: In our study, participants’ treatment adherence and self-efficacy levels were found to be average. Self-efficacy and treatment adherence perceptions should be increased in hypertension patients. Studies on larger sample groups are recommended, considering parameters such as education status, age, and treatment adherence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ÇELİK et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: