PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 20, 20254 citationsOpen Access

Behavioral Impacts of AI Reliance in Diagnostics: Balancing Automation with Skill Retention

View Full Paper
OSOjo Joseph Sunday

Key Points

  • AI and telemedicine enhance access and efficiency in healthcare delivery, yet they risk increasing health inequities.
  • The digital divide represents multidimensional barriers in infrastructure, affordability, and governance that need addressing.
  • Illustrative case studies reveal how task-shifting through telehealth can be both beneficial and polarizing in different countries.
  • Establishing a framework for inclusive digital health is essential to ensure equitable access to healthcare technologies.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of telemedicine and artificial intelligence (AI), transforming healthcare delivery worldwide. These technologies hold promise for improving access, efficiency, and diagnostic accuracy, but their benefits remain unevenly distributed. In many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), persistent gaps in infrastructure, affordability, literacy, and governance risk turning digital innovation into a driver of health inequities. This paper examines the digital divide as a multidimensional health determinant encompassing infrastructure, affordability, human capacity, sociocultural inclusion, and governance. Using illustrative case studies from Africa, South Asia, Latin America, and high-income countries, this study highlights how telehealth and AI can enhance accessibility and enable task-shifting, while also demonstrating how exclusionary design and weak systems may perpetuate disparities. Building on these insights, the paper proposes a multi-sector framework for inclusive digital health, integrating investments in infrastructure, affordable and scalable models, digital literacy, culturally sensitive design, governance reform, sustainable financing, and public–private partnerships. To operationalize this framework, we recommend measurable indicators (e.g., affordability thresholds, literacy benchmarks, governance readiness indices) and propose implementation tools, including a logic model and barrier-to-action checklist. We argue that digital equity must be treated not as a peripheral issue but as a moral imperative for global health justice. Achieving this requires embedding equity into design, financing, and governance from the outset so that telehealth and AI reduce, rather than exacerbate, disparities in healthcare.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ojo Joseph Sunday (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d469ce31b076d99fa66a4ahttps://doi.org/10.63946/ehdi/17088
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper