Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis systematizes indicators for urban vitality and morphology in urban spaces, suggesting improved spatial planning.
The knowledge economy has become ever more important for cities and regions, and different types of urban spaces have been created to accommodate its activities. One of the main assets of these spaces is vitality, a quality that is directly related to innovation and is oftentimes considered the result of spontaneous space arrangements. The recent literature, however, shows that urban vitality is not an intangible quality; it can be correlated to different place quality aspects, such as urban morphology, and measured through existing analytical methods. The aim of this paper is to systematize such indicators and use them to develop algorithms that can be subsequently incorporated into a computational tool for the assessment of knowledge territories during the early design stages, to support their spatial planning and development. The Paris-Saclay Urban Campus is used as a case study to understand and assess these vitality and place quality indicators in an existing benchmark. The results can contribute to the serendipity and the success of new or redeveloped knowledge and innovation areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eloah et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: