This analysis uncovers key connections in responsibility, LTLf outcomes, and strategic reasoning, suggesting effective algorithms.
Responsibility is one of the key notions in machine ethics and in the area of autonomous systems. It is a multi-faceted notion involving counterfactual reasoning about actions and strategies. In this paper, we study different variants of responsibility for LTLf outcomes based on strategic reasoning. We show a connection with notions in reactive synthesis, including the synthesis of winning, dominant, and best-effort strategies. This connection provides a strong computational grounding of responsibility, allowing us to characterize the worst-case computa- tional complexity and devise sound, complete, and optimal algorithms for anticipating and attributing responsibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giacomo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: