PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 20, 2025The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology2 citationsOpen Access

Functional evaluation of the auditory brainstem in migraine patients using ABR and MLD tests

View Full Paper
MAMohammad Shawkat AliHAHayam Abdel‐TawabIAIbrahim H. Abd-Elhmid

Key Points

  • Auditory processing deficits were observed in migraine patients, particularly in chronic cases, indicating significant central dysfunction.
  • ABR tests showed prolonged latencies in waves from both migraine groups compared to controls, underscoring auditory pathway impairments.
  • MLD tests further confirmed decreased auditory function, with significant differences noted between migraine patients and healthy controls.
  • Correlations between ABR metrics and migraine severity suggest that these tests may help evaluate central auditory issues related to migraines.

Abstract

Abstract Background Migraine is a prevalent neurological disorder commonly associated with sensory disturbances, including phonophobia. These symptoms suggest possible involvement of central auditory pathways, particularly at the brainstem level, yet objective data remain limited. Objectives To assess auditory brainstem function in episodic and chronic migraine patients using auditory brainstem response (ABR) and masking level difference (MLD) tests and to explore correlations with migraine severity and disability. Methods A case–control study was conducted with 41 migraine patients (20 episodic, 21 chronic) and 41 age- and sex-matched controls. All subjects had normal peripheral hearing. Evaluations included pure tone audiometry, tympanometry, speech audiometry, acoustic reflexes, ABR, and MLD tests at 500 Hz and 1000 Hz. Migraine-related disability was measured using the Migraine Disability Assessment Test (MIDAS) scale. Statistical analyses involved ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis, and correlation tests. Results There were no significant differences in PTA, SRT, or speech discrimination among groups ( p > 0.05). However, acoustic reflexes were more frequently absent in chronic migraineurs (14.3%) compared to controls (0%), p = 0.035 . MLD values were significantly reduced in migraine patients: MLD 500 (episodic, 8.90 ± 1.89; chronic: 9.71 ± 1.49; control: 4.46 ± 1.38; p < 0.001 ), and MLD 1000 (episodic: 9.20 ± 1.85; chronic: 9.76 ± 1.51; control: 4.63 ± 1.20; p < 0.001 ). ABR analysis revealed prolonged latencies and interpeak intervals in both migraine groups compared to controls, including LIII ( p < 0.001 ), LV ( p < 0.001 ), LI–III ( p < 0.001 ), LIII–V ( p < 0.001 ), and LI–V ( p < 0.001 ). Correlation analysis showed that ABR abnormalities were positively correlated with migraine duration ( r = 0.506–0.614, p < 0.001 ); frequency ( r = 0.470–0.782, p < 0.001 ); and MIDAS scores ( r = 0.594–0.855, p < 0.001 ). Females demonstrated significantly longer latencies in waves III and V than males (e.g., LV, female 5.98 ± 0.16 ms vs. male 5.88 ± 0.06 ms, p = 0.005 ). Conclusion This study demonstrates significant central auditory dysfunction in migraine patients, particularly those with chronic migraine. Prolonged ABR latencies and reduced MLD scores indicate auditory brainstem involvement, which correlates with migraine duration, frequency, and severity. ABR and MLD may serve as objective tools for identifying central auditory processing deficits in migraine.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ali et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d46aae31b076d99fa676d8https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-025-00905-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper