Cross-sectional study shows implementation fidelity impacts clinical outcomes in older adults with type 2 diabetes, suggesting training and education are essential.
Background Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) offers promise for improving diabetes management in older adults; however, its real-world effectiveness depends on implementation fidelity, which remains poorly understood. This study examined fidelity variations and their associations with clinical outcomes in nurse-led CGA for older adults with type 2 diabetes at a tertiary care hospital in China. Methods This cross-sectional implementation study enrolled 3,351 adults aged ≥65 years with type 2 diabetes from Shanghai Jiading District Central Hospital between March 2021 and February 2025. Implementation fidelity was assessed using five validated dimensions yielding a composite score (mean 0.64, SD 0.19; range 0.28–0.94). Primary outcome was glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c); secondary outcomes included cardiometabolic parameters, patient-centered measures, healthcare utilization, and hypoglycemic events. Linear regression models with robust standard errors adjusted for confounders; mediation analysis examined functional status pathways. Results Fidelity demonstrated variation within the hospital (mean 0.64, SD 0.19; range 0.28–0.94), with higher educational attainment, provider experience, and CGA training completion associated with better implementation quality. Higher fidelity was associated with lower HbA1c (adjusted β −0.38 per 0.10-unit increase, 95% CI −0.47 to −0.29; p < 0.001), with a graded association across quartiles [7.89% (95% CI 7.78–8.00) in the lowest quartile vs. 7.16% (95% CI 7.04–7.28) in the highest quartile; p for trend < 0.001]. Benefits were associated with lower systolic blood pressure (−5.10 mm Hg, 95% CI −7.20 to −3.00), LDL cholesterol (−6.50 mg/dl, 95% CI −9.10 to −3.90), improved quality of life (EuroQol-5D: 0.061, 95% CI 0.041–0.081), and decreased depressive symptoms (−1.10, 95% CI −1.40 to −0.80; all p < 0.001). Healthcare utilization declined (hospitalization incidence rate ratio 0.61, 95% CI 0.51–0.73; p < 0.001), and odds of hypoglycemic events were lower (odds ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.72–0.84; p < 0.001). Functional status was an estimated mediator of 31.6% of the fidelity–HbA1c association (indirect β −0.12, 95% CI −0.17 to −0.07; p < 0.001), with age and gait speed modifying associations ( p = 0.04 and 0.02, respectively). Conclusion High-fidelity CGA integration is associated with substantial clinical benefits and lower healthcare utilization; while suggestive of economic advantages, a formal cost-effectiveness evaluation was not undertaken. These associations support an institutional focus on provider training, experience development, and patient education to optimize geriatric diabetes care quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: