Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates strain-driven selective stabilization of metastable tiO2 phases in thin films, highlighting lattice matching.
Stabilizing metastable TiO 2 phases in thin films remains a significant challenge. This paper demonstrates a strain‐driven approach for selectively stabilizing the metastable phases of orthorhombic TiO 2 ‐II and rutile using (111)‐oriented face‐centered cubic (FCC) metal substrates via low‐temperature atomic layer deposition. Epitaxial FCC metal substrates, including Ir and Pt, exhibit a strong preferential (111) orientation and promote the formation of TiO 2 ‐II with a preferential (200) orientation through favorable lattice matching. In contrast, TiO 2 grown on (111)‐textured polycrystalline FCC metals crystallizes into rutile with a preferential (110) orientation despite identical growth conditions, which is attributed to strain relaxation arising from the random in‐plane orientations of FCC metals. Compared to the stable anatase phase, TiO 2 ‐II films exhibit higher density (4.45–4.51 g cm −3 ), higher refractive indices, and higher dielectric constants (≈75–77). These findings reveal that in‐plane strain and lattice matching can be strategically utilized to engineer metastable TiO 2 phases, offering a new approach for the phase‐selective growth of functional oxide films at low temperatures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeon et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: