Empirical analysis assesses ESG criteria's effect on portfolio selection in the S&P 500, indicating investment value.
The purpose of this study is to explore whether ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) criteria can serve as a valuable tool for investors when making rational decisions about financial security selection and portfolio construction. By applying Modern and Post-Modern portfolio theories (MPT and PMPT) under the conditions of ESG and Return Max criterion, our primary objective was determined: “Is ESG a criterion for investors in the rational selection of financial securities and portfolio construction?” A five-year analysis (2018–2023) was carried out on 484 financial securities (companies) from the S&P 500 Stock Index to answer this question. Data collected included the daily close price of the S&P 500 Stock Index, its constituents (484 stocks), ESG scores, risk-free rate, and the equity risk premium of the U.S. market. The results showed that financial securities chosen based on the Return Max criterion were generally undervalued on the market; however, this was not consistently observed by ESG Max where examples of overvalued securities were also identified. Nevertheless, using the Sharpe and Sortino Ratio performance indicators, it was concluded that the return per unit of assumed risk is more appealing to investors (with risk aversion) when considering the portfolios built on the ESG Max criterion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Șerban et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: