PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 19, 2025World Journal of Urology3 citationsOpen Access

Tranexamic acid in radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety

View Full Paper
MMMaurin Helen MangoldVWVictoria Luise Simone WielandMGMaurizio Grilli

Key Points

  • Tranexamic acid significantly reduces perioperative blood transfusion rates in radical cystectomy patients.
  • The odds ratio for blood transfusion reduction with tranexamic acid is 0.48, indicating a strong association.
  • The systematic review combines data from four studies, including one randomized controlled trial and three retrospective cohort studies.
  • Further research is essential to validate findings and establish optimal tranexamic acid dosing in clinical practice.

Abstract

Radical cystectomy (RC) is a high-risk procedure, associated with significant bleeding and high risk of perioperative blood transfusion (PBT), which may limit clinical and oncological outcomes. Tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic agent, effectively reduces bleeding in various surgical settings; however, its role in RC remains understudied. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of TXA in RC patients. A systematic search of CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, and Web-of-Science was conducted, including studies published between January 2013 and January 2025. Four studies (one randomised controlled trial (RCT) and three retrospective cohort studies) met inclusion criteria. Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and RoB-2, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. TXA was associated with a significant reduction in overall PBT (odds ratio (OR) 0.48, 95%-confidence interval (CI) 0.27–0.82; p = 0.008), though the only RCT included failed to identify this trend. Estimated blood loss was numerically reduced in the TXA group, but did not reach statistical significance (mean difference − 36.8 mL; 95%-CI -78.1-4.6; p = 0.08). Notably, TXA did not increase the incidence of venous thromboembolism (OR 1.49, 95%-CI 0.86–2.57; p = 0.16). Key limitations include substantial heterogeneity between studies (I² = 78% for PBT outcome), varying TXA dosing protocols, and the predominance of retrospective studies. TXA may reduce PBT requirements in RC without increasing thromboembolic risk. Further research is needed to confirm these findings, refine dosing protocols, and assess efficacy in minimally invasive RC.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mangold et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d46cd731b076d99fa69607https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05939-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Risk of Venous Thromboembolic Events After Surgery for Cancer2024 · 47 citations
  2. 2Apixaban versus Dalteparin for the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer: The Caravaggio Study2018 · 147 citations
  3. 3Tranexamic acid reduces perioperative blood transfusions following open radical cystectomy – a propensity-score matched analysis2024 · 5 citations
  4. 4Systematic reviews in surgery—recommendations from the Study Center of the German Society of Surgery2021 · 84 citations
  5. 5Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (RAZOR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial2018 · 787 citations