Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mixed-methods analysis identifies core principles for integrating traditional ecological knowledge into sustainable resource management, suggesting pathways for diverse contexts.
The integration of traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) into contemporary landscape planning is hampered by a lack of methodological frameworks that can translate site-specific practices into generalizable design principles. This study addresses this gap by developing and applying an integrated analytical framework to decode the resilient Ruza farming system in Nagaland, India. Employing a mixed-methods approach that triangulates qualitative data (ethnographic observation, semi-structured interviews) with spatial analysis (drone-based orthomosaics), this research moves beyond mere description to extract a set of transferable socio-ecological design principles. The findings identify four core principles such as vertical integration, gravity-fed resource flow, closed-loop resource cycling, and participatory governance, that underpin the system’s functionality. By demonstrating a clear methodological pathway from fieldwork to framework, this research contributes a replicable “methodological bridge” for landscape architects and planners. While derived from a single case study, the framework offers a robust approach for applying the logic of TEK to create climate-resilient and culturally grounded designs in diverse contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wonglangka et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: