Analysis reveals associations between pollen fitness alleles and spatial progeny distribution in maize, suggesting variability in inheritance traits.
Often, more pollen grains land on recipient flowers than there are ovules to fertilize. Consequently, the haploid male gametophyte engages in post-pollination competition, one way that pollen genotype can influence inheritance. The maize ( Zea mays subsp. mays L.) inflorescence (ear), with its elongated stigma and style structures (silks), has a conspicuous spatial heterogeneity, with longer silks at the base of the ear than those at the apex. To evaluate the hypothesis that alleles with reduced pollen fitness influence the spatial distribution of progeny genotypes along the ear, we developed an updated phenotyping platform that maps mutant Ds-GFP kernel phenotypes on the ear via an implementation of the Faster R-CNN machine vision model (EarVision.v2) and a statistical pipeline that evaluates the relationship between kernel position and transmission ratio (EarScape). In our dataset (1384 ears) representing 58 Ds-GFP alleles, none with Mendelian inheritance (0/48) showed any significant pollen-conditioned spatial trend. In contrast, 50% of alleles with a pollen-specific transmission defect (5/10) exhibited significant spatial effects. An insertion into a gene encoding a putative actin-binding protein, base-to-apex gradient1* ( bag1* ), conditions increased mutant transmission at the ear apex relative to the base. Surprisingly, mutant alleles of two other pollen-expressed genes can generate the opposite pattern, decreased mutant transmission toward the ear apex; and two mutant alleles of the sperm-cell attachment factor, gamete expressed2 ( gex2 ), can produce ears with transmission highest at both base and apex. We conclude that pollen fitness mutants have relatively common but heterogenous effects on the spatial distribution of progeny genotypes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruggiero et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: