Investigating Linguistic Synchrony in Parole Hearings

Linguistic mimicry, also known as linguistic style matching (LSM), fosters rapport and influences communication outcomes. In high-stakes settings, such as parole hearings, LSM can shape perceptions of trust and credibility, which in turn can influence parole decisions. This study examines how offenders' language aligns with parole board members and whether this alignment varies by risk level. Using BUTTER software to analyze parole hearing transcripts, we measured LSM across linguistic categories, comparing mimicry levels between low-, moderate-, and high-risk offenders. Contrary to expectations, results indicated no significant differences in LSM or word count across risk levels. These findings suggest that communication dynamics during parole hearings may be less influenced by offender risk level than previously assumed, possibly reflecting standardized procedures or institutional norms. This research contributes to our understanding of language use in institutional settings. It raises important questions about how consistency in communication may impact perceptions of fairness and rapport in legal decision-making contexts.