PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 23, 2025Computers3 citationsOpen Access

Beyond Opacity: Distributed Ledger Technology as a Catalyst for Carbon Credit Market Integrity

View Full Paper
SHStanton HeisterFHFelix Kin Peng HuiDWDavid I. Wilson

Key Points

  • Distributed ledger technology can enhance market integrity by providing immutable transaction records.
  • Case studies from the EU, Australia, and China indicate potential for scalable global carbon trading.
  • Regulatory harmonization and standardization pose challenges to fully leverage DLT in carbon markets.
  • Automated verification with smart contracts can significantly decrease transaction costs in carbon trading.

Abstract

The 2015 Paris Agreement paved the way for the carbon trade economy, which has since evolved but has not attained a substantial magnitude. While carbon credit exchange is a critical mechanism for achieving global climate targets, it faces persistent challenges related to transparency, double-counting, and verification. This paper examines how Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) can address these limitations by providing immutable transaction records, automated verification through digitally encoded smart contracts, and increased market efficiency. To assess DLT’s strategic potential for leveraging the carbon markets and, more explicitly, whether its implementation can reduce transaction costs and enhance market integrity, three alternative approaches that apply DLT for carbon trading were taken as case studies. By comparing key elements in these DLT-based carbon credit platforms, it is elucidated that these proposed frameworks may be developed for a scalable global platform. The integration of existing compliance markets in the EU (case study 1), Australia (case study 2), and China (case study 3) can act as a standard for a global carbon trade establishment. The findings from these case studies suggest that while DLT offers a promising path toward more sustainable carbon markets, regulatory harmonization, standardization, and data transfer across platforms remain significant challenges.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Heister et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4724731b076d99fa6a803https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14090403
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Blockchain Technology in Carbon Trading Markets: Impacts, Benefits, and Challenges—A Case Study of the Shanghai Environment and Energy Exchange2024 · 39 citations
  2. 2Empirical Performance Analysis of Hyperledger LTS for Small and Medium Enterprises2022 · 33 citations
  3. 3Networked Carbon Markets: Permissionless Innovation with Distributed Ledgers?2018 · 11 citations
  4. 4Blockchain for Supply Chain Traceability: Business Requirements and Critical Success Factors2019 · 900 citations
  5. 5The Energy Consumption of Blockchain Technology: Beyond Myth2020 · 500 citations