Assessment revealed moderate biodiversity in oak stands, highlighting factors like wood stock and canopy density.
The aim of this study is the estimation of the biodiversity of pure oak stands within the jurisdiction of the Forest Service of Xanthi in northeastern Greece. Using a published graded biodiversity index that operates on management-plan description sheets, we scored five stand-level attributes (total wood stock, age of trees, canopy density, presence of regeneration, and stand aspect/orientation) for every eligible stand and classified biodiversity as low, moderate, or high. These data were sourced from the description sheets of pure oak stands found in the management plans of public forest complexes. Moderate biodiversity predominates (63.4% of stands), followed by low (33.5%), while high biodiversity is scarce (3.1%). Forest practice can influence all the factors which were used for the assessment of the biodiversity characterization of the stands except the aspect of the stand. From these factors the total amount of wood stock and the canopy density were the main factors which determined the low percentage of high-biodiversity stands. On the other hand, the age structure and the regeneration existence were the main factors which counterbalanced the negative influence of the total amount of wood stock and of the canopy density and thus led to the dominance of the stands characterized as having moderate biodiversity score.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michailidis et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: