Loading...
This work demonstrates improved worst-case update times for maintaining EDCS in dynamic graphs, highlighting density-sensitive properties.
In their breakthrough ICALP’15 paper, Bernstein and Stein presented an algorithm for maintaining a \((3/2+ε)\) -approximate maximum matching in fully dynamic bipartite graphs with a worst-case update time of \(Oε(m1/4)\) ; we use the \(Oε\) notation to suppress the \(ε\) -dependence. Their main technical contribution was in presenting a new type of bounded-degree subgraph, which they named an edge degree constrained subgraph (EDCS) , which contains a large matching — of size that is smaller than the maximum matching size of the entire graph by at most a \(3/2+ε\) factor. They demonstrate that the EDCS can be maintained with a worst-case update time of \(Oε(m1/4)\) , and their main result follows as a direct corollary. In their followup SODA’16 paper, Bernstein and Stein generalized their result for general graphs, achieving the same update time of \(Oε(m1/4)\) , albeit with an amortized rather than worst-case bound. To date, the best deterministic worst-case update time bound for any better-than-2 approximate matching is \(O(√m)\) [Neiman and Solomon, STOC’13], [Gupta and Peng, FOCS’13]; allowing randomization (against an oblivious adversary) one can achieve a much better (still polynomial) update time for approximation slightly below 2 [Behnezhad, Łacki and Mirrokni, SODA’20]. In this work we 1 simplify the approach of Bernstein and Stein for bipartite graphs, which allows us to generalize it to general graphs while maintaining the same \(Oε(m1/4)\) bound on the worst-case update time. Moreover, our approach is density-sensitive : If the arboricity of the dynamic graph is always bounded by \(α\) , then the worst-case update time of the algorithm is \(Oε(√α)\) .
Grandoni et al. (2025) studied this question.