Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study shows pEGASUS-HPC technique reduced catheterization time in wide-necked aneurysms, indicating improved efficacy.
Abstract Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the pusher-assisted catheterization (PAC) technique using the pEGASUS-HPC stent pusher instead of a microwire for accessing unruptured wide-necked cerebral aneurysms during Y-stent-assisted coiling. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study (July 2021– June 2025), 48 unruptured wide-necked cerebral aneurysms underwent Y-stent-assisted coiling using pEGASUS HPC stents. Based on the catheterization technique, cases were assigned to either the microwire-assisted catheterization (MAC, n=23) or the stent pusher-assisted catheterization (PAC, n=25) group. Clinical and procedural data were analyzed to compare safety and efficacy, focusing on success rates, required catheterization time, complications, and adverse events. Results: The cohort had a mean age of 62.6 ± 9.8 years, with 64.3% of patients being female. In the MAC group, aneurysm catheterization was successful in all 23 cases (100%), with a mean catheterization time of 5.31 ± 1.2 minutes. In contrast, the PAC group achieved successful catheterization in 88% of cases (22/25), with a markedly reduced mean catheterization time of 0.82 ± 0.27 minutes—approximately 6.5 times faster than the conventional MAC technique (p < 0.001). Importantly, no procedure-related complications, such as perforations or dissections, were observed in either group. Conclusion: The PAC technique using the pEGASUS-HPC stent appears to be a safe and time-efficient alternative to microwire-assisted catheterization in Y-stent-assisted coiling of unruptured wide-necked cerebral aneurysms. It significantly reduces catheterization time without increasing complication rates. Further studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almohammad et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: