PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 23, 2025American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A4 citations

The De Novo p.(Ser802Phe) Variant Causes Helsmoortel‐Van der Aa/ADNP Syndrome in a 24‐Year‐Old Woman and Is Predicted to Perturb ADNP‐DNA Affinity

View Full Paper
MBMario BenvenutoMGMarilena Carmela Di GiacomoAPAda Piepoli

Key Points

  • The identified p.(Ser802Phe) variant is linked to significant behavioral disturbances and physical manifestations.
  • A 24-year-old Italian woman exhibited symptoms including intellectual disability, visual impairment, and microcephaly.
  • Next-generation sequencing confirmed the presence of a de novo missense variant affecting ADNP's DNA-binding function.
  • This case suggests potential gain-of-function in ADNP due to an unexpected increase in ADNP-DNA interaction strength.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The ADNP syndrome, also known as Helsmoortel‐Van der Aa syndrome (HVDAS), is an autosomal dominant neurodevelopmental disorder caused by heterozygous truncating variants abolishing the homeobox and/or HP1 domains of ADNP. Rare missense changes in the ADNP gene are usually variants of uncertain significance or reclassified as (likely) benign because they are inherited from an unaffected parent, and a causative role was documented for only three of them. We report a 24‐year‐old Italian woman presenting with intellectual disability, visual and severe speech impairment, microcephaly, truncal obesity, and hirsutism. Behavioral disturbance was significant and included fragmented sleep, self‐ and hetero‐aggression, outbursts of anger, and verbal and physical violence crises. Additional unusual findings were hyperandrogenism and secondary amenorrhea. Next‐generation sequencing showed the novel de novo missense variant c.2405C>T, p.(Ser802Phe) affecting the DNA‐binding homeodomain of ADNP . In silico analysis revealed this variant is located in a genomic region highly intolerant to missense changes, and several tools predicted a deleterious effect on protein function. Counterintuitively to the known molecular pathogenesis for ADNP syndrome, calculation of the binding free energy and dissociation constant of the p.(Ser802Phe) missense substitution suggested a stronger ADNP‐DNA interaction, thus opening the path to the hypothesis of a gain‐of‐function effect. This clinical report expands genotype–phenotype variability and correlations in ADNP syndrome.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Benvenuto et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4724f31b076d99fa6ad4ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.64264
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Blepharophimosis with intellectual disability and Helsmoortel‐Van Der Aa Syndrome share episignature and phenotype2024 · 7 citations
  2. 2DNA binding analysis of rare variants in homeodomains reveals homeodomain specificity-determining residues2024 · 26 citations
  3. 3Protective inherited mutations in activity-dependent neuroprotective protein (ADNP): the good, the bad, and the ugly2024 · 8 citations
  4. 4Extended phenotypic characterization of a novel Helsmoortel‐van der Aa syndrome case series2024 · 7 citations
  5. 5Arpeggio: A Web Server for Calculating and Visualising Interatomic Interactions in Protein Structures2016 · 541 citations